Heres a hack that might work for you. If its in the Microsoft cloud, on One Drive or a SharePoint list with version control turned on, you can just roll it back to the older version. The key is above the cursor/arrow keypad on PCs I'm guessing Mac is similar.Answer (1 of 3): It depends on where your file is stored. OOo Writer shows a label in the status bar (below editing area): INSRT/OVER so you can see that change if you're hitting the right key. Mac keyboard, I don't know, but PC keyboards have a key labeled 'Ins' or 'Insert' that toggles between insert and overtype modes.Wide open for other apps to mimic TB & Firefox - and include everything that Mozilla *should* have addressed & included. And of course - improving on those features and adding more? The majority of Windows platform users will be used to Internet Explorer, Outlook Express, or Outlook - all which allow use of the Insert key.I am complaining rather loudly because this is not by any means the only 'feature' that is 'surprisingly' missing.The doors are open. Just becasuse Notepad doesn't allow the use of the Insert key, doesn't mean that it's something Firefox or Thunderbird users wouldn't *not* expect to see.It is primarily used to switch between the two text-entering modes on a personal computer (PC) or word processor: overtype mode, in which the cursor, when.That's right - Firefox AND Thunderbird (so pretty safe to say "Mozilla products"?) don't implement the Insert key function.Shouldn't Mozilla be encouraging users to 'make the switch' from other competing products by offering essentially the same functionality that they're used to. There's a key on my keyboard that says 'Insert'. Some applications indicate overtype mode with a letter-width cursor box, as opposed to the standard narrow cursor however, others use the narrow cursor for both modes, and indicate overtype with an 'OVR.Then, the feedback helps to let users> Supporting wide carets is really easy. At least Firefox's plus-side far out-weighs it's negatives.> If we support this bug, we should support wide caret first (the width should be> same as the overwritten character width). And if that weren't enough, Microsoft is going to be launching Windows Vista, a new version of Internet Explorer featuring Tabbed browsing, AND totally updating Outlook Express with a 'new' app called Microsoft Mail - which will be chock-full of fantastic new email & newsgroup features that will put TB to shame.It's sad - I *want* to like Thunderbird, but there's so many things that are but just shouldn't be.
Overtype Mode In Word Code Change HereAnd if we could implement it, we could remove the wider caret of bug 335359 because it guarantees caret is blinking on all cases.> But the main code change here is supporing the insertion mode. Sharable approach is better. See bug 335359.> And also the feature is needed for Korean IME on Windows (see bug 489951).> I don't exactly understand what the relationship here is.So, the character width caret is useful for IME implementation too. I> don't think that the caret functionality should be spread over to nsTextFrame."wider" caret isn't good for CJK text because we already using wider caret if next character is a CJK character. The CJK caret is something entirely different.> Another possible idea is, we implement only the overwriting mode first but it's> disabled by pref. I guess the caret should follow the platform conventions though. See bug 335359.By wide, I meant a caret as wide as the character itself. Therefore, I don't have enough time for editor in this cycle.> know which mode has been activated.> "wider" caret isn't good for CJK text because we already using wider caret if> next character is a CJK character. If you're willing to work on this, I can give you a more> precise idea of what needs to change roughly.I'm working on implementing DOM3 key/composition/text events on all tire-1 platforms and some mouse wheel handling code improvement on Windows. Ouble space on word for macNor can I believe that a "smaller set of users" would have misunderstood "Insert" or "Overwrite" being displayed in Word. As Bernd said above, this is something that many "normal" users expect because most word processing software (not to mention unix editors) support it.While I understand the various objections (lack of visual indicator, confusion if accidentally turned on), all can be dealt with making this only available by going out of your way to activate it through an option.I can't believe that such basic editing functionality that has been present on editors of all kinds and all operating systems for the 25 years I have been using computers was omitted in the first place. In overwrite mode you can just bang away over the underscores without ending up in reformat hell.The reason people really want to see this in Firefox is because then we would (presumably) gain overwrite mode for Google Docs and other web-based editors. Frankly, it is a giant pain in the behind. Although this is pretty low on my list of things to do in the editor.> naive question: what do people gain by having type over mode?Overwrite mode is useful because some people email you "forms" that are formatted for printing so they look (literally) like this:First Name: _ Last Name: _I request to meet with teacher _ for _At _ because I need extra credit remedial help(Schools seem particularly prone to this kind of thing.)With Insert Mode, your only option for returning a correctly formatted form is to type in your name and then delete as many occurences of the _ as you typed in. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorAlex ArchivesCategories |